domingo, 25 de enero de 2015

'Jim, Who Ran Away from his Nurse and Was Eaten by a Lion'

Wednesday 21st January,

Hi Isabel!

How’s it going?
 I hope your doubts about the different uses of modal verbs are sorted out.
 Theoretically, they’re not difficult. Make sure of understanding their different uses. When they indicate ability, permission, obligation etc. the past of can is could. The past of must is had to. When the modal verbs indicate possibility, you make the past using the modal + have +participle.

Last week we read a poem called ‘Jim, who ran away from his nurse and was eaten by a lion”. The moral of the poem is that naughty kids must behave properly because if they don’t, dangerous and terrible things can happen to them…
The poem was written in 1907. I want to think that in the twenty- first Century we prefer to teach our kids manners and to watch over possible dangers without the need of making them terrified of …living!

Hilaire Belloc

1870–1953
Hilaire Belloc
Hilaire Belloc is considered one of the most controversial and accomplished men of letters of early 20th-century England. An author whose writings continue to draw either the deep admiration or bitter contempt of readers, he was an outspoken proponent of radical social and economic reforms, all grounded in his vision of Europe as a "Catholic society." Although many critics have attacked Belloc's prescriptive polemical works for their tone of truculence and intolerance—and, especially, for recurrent elements of anti-Semitism—they have also joined in praise of his humor and poetic skill, hailing Belloc as the greatest English writer of light verse since Lewis Carroll and Edward Lear.

The son of a wealthy French father and English mother, Belloc was born in La Celle St. Cloud, France, a few days before the Franco-Prussian War broke out. The family fled to England at the news of the French army's collapse, returning after the war's end to discover that the Belloc home had been looted and vandalized by Prussian soldiers. Although the estate was eventually restored and made habitable, the evidence of destruction witnessed by Belloc's parents and later recounted to their children made a deep impression on Hilaire; throughout his life and through the two world wars, he habitually referred to Germany as "Prussia" and considered the "Prussians" a barbaric people worthy only of utter contempt.

By the mid-1890s Belloc had married and, through the influence of his sister Marie Belloc Lowndes, begun writing for various London newspapers and magazines. His first book, Verses and Sonnets, appeared in 1896, followed by The Bad Child's Book of Beasts, which satirized moralistic verse for children and proved immensely popular. Illustrated with superb complementary effect by Belloc's friend Basil T. Blackwood,The Bad Child's Book of Beasts, according to critics, contains much of the author's best light verse, as do such later collections as More Beasts (for Worse Children), The Modern Traveller and Cautionary Tales for Children. An impulsive man who seldom lived in any one place for more than a few weeks and whose frequent trips to the continent proved a constant drain on his financial resources, Belloc welcomed the popular success of his verse collections. But, embracing Cardinal Edward Henry Manning's dictum that "all human conflict is ultimately theological," he perceived his primary role as that of polemicist and reformer, whose every work must reflect his desire for Europe's spiritual, social, and political return to its monarchist, Catholic heritage. Belloc's career as an advocate of Catholicism first attracted wide public attention in 1902 with The Path to Rome, perhaps his most famous single book, in which he recorded the thoughts and impressions that came to him during a walking trip through France and Italy to Rome. In addition to its infusion of Catholic thought, the work contains what later became acknowledged as typically Bellocian elements: rich, earthy humor; an eye for natural beauty; and a meditative spirit—all of which appear in the author's later travel books, which include Esto Perpetua, The Four Men,and The Cruise of the "Nona."

The period between the century's turn and the mid-1920s was the time of Belloc's widest fame and influence. Throughout these years Belloc's name and reputation were frequently linked in the public mind with G. K. Chesterton, whom Belloc had met around 1900 when each was a contributor to the radical journal the Speaker. In Chesterton, Belloc found a talented illustrator of his books, a friend, and a man who shared and publicly advocated many of his own religious and political views. Anti-industrial and antimodern in much of their advocacy, the two were jointly caricatured in print by George Bernard Shaw as "the Chesterbelloc," an absurd pantomime beast of elephantine appearance and outmoded beliefs. Both, according to Shaw and other adverse critics, had a passion for lost causes. Belloc and Chesterton were "Little Englanders"—opposed to British colonialism and imperialism—whose essays in theSpeaker had infuriated many Londoners by the authors' opposition to Britain's imperial designs on South Africa and the nation's participation in the Boer War. Each looked to the Middle Ages as an era of spiritual and material fulfillment when Europe was united in Catholicism and small landowners worked their own, Church-allotted parcels of property, providing for their own individual needs, free from both the wage-slavery that later developed under capitalism and the confiscatory taxation and collectivist policies of state socialism. (Belloc in particular, after serving for several years as a Liberal M.P. in the House of Commons, held a cynical view of the modern British political system, seeing little difference in the methods of the government's Liberal and Conservative ministers, who were often, to his disgust, fellow clubmen and the closest of friends outside the halls of Parliament.) As an alternative both to capitalism and to the Fabian socialism advanced by such contemporaries as Shaw, H. G. Wells, and Beatrice and Sidney Webb, Belloc propounded an economic and political program called Distributism, a system of small landholding which harks back to Europe's pre-Reformation history. This system was outlined in the 1891 Papal Encyclical Rerum Novarum, and is fully described in Belloc's controversial essay The Servile State, published in 1912.

The Chesterbelloc's political ideas were also expounded in the Eye Witness, a weekly political and literary journal edited by Belloc, which became one of the most widely read periodicals in pre-war England. Belloc attracted as contributors such distinguished authors as Shaw, Wells, Maurice Baring, and Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch. In addition, he and his subeditor, Cecil Chesterton, involved the Eye Witness in a political uproar in 1912 when they uncovered the Marconi Scandal, in which several prominent government officials used confidential information concerning impending international business contracts in order to speculate in the stock of the Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company. Although Belloc continued to contribute articles and occasionally edit the periodical, the Eye Witness eventually passed to Cecil Chesterton's editorship as the New Witness, which, after Cecil's death in World War I, came under his brother's supervision, becoming in 1925 G. K.'s Weekly, the principal organ of the Distributist League. By then, Belloc had established himself as a polemicist who could write forceful and convincing essays on nearly any subject, in a prose style marked by clarity and wit. His reputation as a polemicist reached its zenith in 1926 when, in A Companion to Mr. Wells's "Outline of History," he attacked his longtime opponent's popular book as a simpleminded, nonscientific, anti-Catholic document. A war of mutual refutation ensued, fought by both writers in the pages of several books and essays. Ironically, although much of the scientific community now affirms Wells's biological theses as presented in the Outline, during the 1920s the preponderance of evidence supported the findings of Belloc, who, in the minds of some observers, bested Wells in their exchange of polemical broadsides. 
You can continue reading  clicking  here

We used the poem to learn synonyms or near synonyms.
Buddies /friends   delicious / tasty   novels / stories   frequently / often  
hurried / ran        gradually / slowly  initially/ first        told /informed

We didn’t have time for more, as we were trying to work out the viewing of the blog!

See you on Wednesday!

domingo, 18 de enero de 2015

Modal Verbs

Wednesday 14th January,

Hi Isabel,
So, we started the course as we finished it, with modal verbs!
It’s very important to understand the uses of modal verbs. Separate them into two groups according to what they express: obligation /prohibition or speculation/possibility.

Modal Verbs can express:
ability
He can’t ski.
advice
You should stop smoking.
obligation
You must stop at the crossroads.
You must see the film.
permission
Can I go to the party?
probability
He must be rich.
It might rain.
It’ll be a good party.
willingness
I’ll help you.
unwillingness
I won’t help you.
We also have some related verbs:

ability
manage to / be able to
advice
had better / Why don’t you
obligation
have (got)to
be required to
permission
be allowed to
probability
be bound to
be supposed to
be likely to
willingness
promise to
unwillingness
refuse to
We studied modal verbs for obligation, prohibition, permission and advice.


Obligation
Must (I must, when you impose the obligation yourself)
Have to (usually for rules  or laws)
Prohibition
Mustn’t /Can’t / isn’t- aren’t allowed to

No necessity
Don’t / doesn’t have to
Advice / recommendation
should / shouldn’t
ought to / ought not to









We’ve gone through the different uses of Modal verbs. Here’s the summary:

+
-
Modals of probability ( present and future)


Will
won’t
They express what we strongly believe to be true about the present. Based on our knowledge of people and things: routine, character etc.
Is that the phone?
It’ll be John. He said he’d ring around now.
Must
can’t
Must is used to express what we infer or conclude to be the most logical or rational interpretation of events. (less certain that “will”) / “can’t” is the negative of must.
- Look over there! That must be Jon’s new car.
- She can’t have a ten-year-old daughter! She’s only 25!
Should
shouldn’t
It expresses what may reasonably be expected to happen; also that we want that whatever is predicted to happen.
- Our guests should be here soon. (If they haven’t got lost)

- This homework shouldn’t take you long.
May
may not
It expresses the possibility that sth will happen or is already happening.
- We may go to Greece for our holidays. We haven’t decided yet.
- We may not have enough money to go abroad this year.
Might
might not
It expresses possibility bur in a more tentative way.
- It might rain, but I doubt it.
- I might not be back in time for supper, so don’t wait for me.
Could
might not
is used in a similar way to “might”
- It could rain, but I doubt it.
- It looks like it could rain, but it might not.

*The negative “couldn’t” has a similar meaning to “can’t,” only slightly weaker.
She couldn’t have a ten-year-old daughter! She’s only 25!
Can

We use it to express what it is generally and all-time true. It cannot be used to predict future possibility.(Will be possible or will be able to)
Cycling in town can be dangerous.
Modal  auxiliaries in the past
All the modal verbs given above are also used with have + past participle to express different degrees of certainty about the past.


·         You met a man with a moustache? That would have been my uncle tom.
·         It won’t have been Peter you met at the party. He wasn’t invited.
·         It must have been Simon. He looks like Peter.
·         It can’t have been a very interesting party. No one seems to have enjoyed it.
·         Where’s Henry? He should have been here ages ago!
·         He might have decided not to come. He could have had an accident.
·         He can hardly have forgotten to come.
·         “Can have” is only used in questions or with “hardly, only or never”.
·         Where can he have got to go?
·         They can only have known each other for a few weeks.

I hope it helps! See you on Wednesday!



martes, 6 de enero de 2015

HAPPY 2015!!!!

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!! HAPPY 2015!!!

Hello Isabel! Are you enjoying your winter holidays?
 There’s still a week left before we start our classes in this New Year, 2015. We may see us on 8th, though.

What did you do during your holidays?


I went to the village both on Christmas Eve (24th December) and on New Year’s Eve (31st December). I got to the village by train on 23rd December. My brother and his family were already at my parents’ house. I set ‘The manger’ (the typical Nativity Scene which is traditional at Christmas in Spain). I didn’t put up the Christmas tree because my mother, nephew and niece had already done it.


The weather was cold, as usual at this time of the year. When the train left Madrid, it was sunny there but in the village was foggy and cold. On Christmas Eve I had dinner with my family: my parents, my brother, my sister in law, my nephew and my niece. After dinner we played cards, bingo and board games.
On Christmas Day, we opened the presents that Father Christmas brought us and we went out to have the aperitif (alcoholic drink before lunch to whet, stimulate, the appetite) before lunch.

On New Year’s Eve, I went to the village again. The weather was Ok. It was cold but sunny. I had dinner with my parents. My brother and his family weren’t there that night. They were at their parents in law. We had dinner, we tried to eat up the ‘grapes’ (we couldn’t. There were very big this year. I hope to be lucky, anyway)

 I spent Twelfth Night (5th January) at home, waiting for my presents because I was very good last year!
Well, why don’t you write what you did at Christmas? Did you do anything similar to that?



See you !!!